کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3027062 1182938 2015 5 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Practice variation in the management of distal deep vein thrombosis in primary vs. secondary cares: A clinical practice survey
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
تنوع تمرین در مدیریت ترومبوز ورید عمقی دیستال در مراقبت های اولیه و ثانویه: یک بررسی بالینی عمل
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی کاردیولوژی و پزشکی قلب و عروق
چکیده انگلیسی


• In France GP and VMP treat distal and proximal DVT with full dose of anticoagulants
• Most GP consider that distal and proximal DVT exhibit the same risks
• Half of GP do not modulate duration of anticoagulation therapy of DVT
• Systematic referral to a thrombosis expert seems appropriate to improve management

IntroductionDistal deep-vein thromboses (iDDVT) are infra-popliteal DVTs. They are as frequent but less serious than proximal DVT. Their management is debated.MethodsClinical practice survey among a random selection of 111 general practitioners (GP) and 56 vascular medicine physicians (VMP) working in Languedoc-Roussillon (France) to assess and compare iDDVTs management by GP and VMP.ResultsIn case of DVT, GP manage their patients alone in 35% of cases. In case of collaborative management, VMP initiate and stop anticoagulants (> 74% of cases) whereas GP monitor anticoagulation (> 76% of cases). With iDDVT, there was no difference between GP and VMP in terms of use (94% vs. 92%) and intensity of anticoagulation (full dose: 99%vs.100%). Duration of anticoagulation differed: GP modulated less frequently duration of anticoagulation in presence of a transient risk factor (58% vs. 90%, p < 0.05) or according to the deep-calf or muscular location of iDDVT (6% vs. 36%, p < 0.05) and treated more frequently iDDVT as long as proximal DVT (49% vs. 13%, p < 0.05). When comparing GP, there was no significant difference in terms of therapeutic management between those who used to manage DVT alone and those who used to manage in collaboration with a thrombosis expert.ConclusionTreatment of iDDVT differed between GP and VMP. Half of GP don’t modulate treatment according to anatomical location or to the provoked/unprovoked character of DVT. Given the low frequency of exposure to DVT in general practice, systematic referral to a thrombosis expert rather than continuous medical formation program seems appropriate to improve management.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Thrombosis Research - Volume 136, Issue 3, September 2015, Pages 526–530
نویسندگان
, , , , , ,