کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
3043956 | 1184989 | 2014 | 7 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

• Nerve ultrasound may be used in quantifying pathological cross sectional area changes.
• The Bochum Ultrasound score allows a distinction of CIDP from AIDP.
• Both the CIDP and AIDP show peripheral nerve and brachial plexus enlargements.
ObjectiveAim of this study was to develop and evaluate the applicability of an ultrasound score (Bochum ultrasound score – BUS) in distinguishing chronic (CIDP) from acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP).Methods
• Step 1: For the development of BUS 75 healthy-controls, 20 CIDP, 20 AIDP patients underwent US 4.55 ± 3.5 and 3.4 ± 2.91 years, respectively after onset. After comparing the distribution pattern and frequency of pathological US changes between the two study groups, we developed BUS, summarizing the cross sectional area (CSA) of: (1) the ulnar nerve in Guyons’ canal, (2) the ulnar nerve in upper-arm, (3) the radial nerve in spiral groove, (4) the sural nerve between the gastrocnemius muscle.
• Step 2: The BUS underwent blinded evaluation in further 10 CIDP, 21 AIDP patients 3.8 ± 2.7 and 2.3 ± 1.5 years, respectively after onset.
• Step 3: The BUS underwent blinded, prospective evaluation in 8 patients with acute/subacute polyradiculoneuropathy (5 CIDP, 3 AIDP) 2.6 ± 1.8 weeks after onset.ResultsThe BUS showed a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 90.4% (positive predictive value, PPV = 81.8%; negative predictive value, NPV = 95%) in distinguishing CIDP from AIDP, when they showed no differences in disease duration (p = 0.0551).In addition, the BUS distinguished subacute-CIDP from AIDP with a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 100% (PPV = 100%, NPV = 75%).ConclusionThe BUS seems to allow a reliable distinction of CIDP from AIDP.SignificanceThe BUS may be helpful in distinguishing subacute-CIDP from AIDP.
Journal: Clinical Neurophysiology - Volume 125, Issue 3, March 2014, Pages 635–641