کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3116249 1582696 2014 10 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: An assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
استفاده بالینی از یک اسکنر دهان مستقیم صندلی: ارزیابی دقت، زمان و پذیرش بیمار
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی دندانپزشکی، جراحی دهان و پزشکی
چکیده انگلیسی


• Digital models made from intraoral scans are as accurate as those made from alginate impressions.
• Alginate impressions require less chairside time and are preferred over intraoral scans by most patients.
• As technology continues to progress, intraoral scans may become more accepted in orthodontics.

IntroductionChairside oral scanners allow direct digital acquisition of the intraoral situation and can eliminate the need for conventional impressions. In this study, we aimed to assess accuracy, scan time, and patient acceptance of a chairside oral scanner when used for full-arch scans; these are critical factors for acceptance of this technology in the orthodontic setting.MethodsFifteen patients had digital models made from both intraoral scans (Lava COS; 3M ESPE, St Paul, Minn) and alginate impressions. Each procedure was timed, and patient preference was assessed with a survey. In addition, digital models were made from 5 plaster model pairs using the intraoral scanner and an orthodontic model scanner. Model pairs were digitally superimposed, and differences between models were quantified. Accuracy was assessed using the Bland-Altman method. Time differences were tested for statistical significance with the Student t test.ResultsDigital models made using the chairside oral scanner and either impressions or the orthodontic model scanner did not differ significantly. The chair time required to take impressions was significantly shorter than the time required for the intraoral scans. When processing time was included, the time requirement did not differ significantly between methods. Although 73.3% of the patients preferred impressions because they were “easier” or “faster,” 26.7% preferred the scan because it was “more comfortable.”ConclusionsDespite the high accuracy of chairside oral scanners, alginate impressions are still the preferred model acquisition method with respect to chair time and patient acceptance. As digital technology continues to progress, intraoral scanning may become more accepted for use in orthodontics.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics - Volume 146, Issue 5, November 2014, Pages 673–682
نویسندگان
, , ,