کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
316296 537711 2015 10 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Factor structure and reliability of the Arabic adaptation of the Hypomania Check List-32, second revision (HCL-32-R2)
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علم عصب شناسی روانپزشکی بیولوژیکی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Factor structure and reliability of the Arabic adaptation of the Hypomania Check List-32, second revision (HCL-32-R2)
چکیده انگلیسی

ObjectiveTo assess the psychometric properties of the Arabic adaptation of the Hypomania-Check-List 32-item, second revision (HCL-32-R2) for the detection of bipolarity in major depressive disorder (MDD) inpatients suffering a current major depressive episode (MDE).MethodThe “Bipolar Disorders: Improving Diagnosis, Guidance, and Education” Arabic module of the HCL-32-R2 was administered to mother-tongue Arabic MDE inpatients between March 2013 and October 2014. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Fourth edition (DSM-IV) diagnoses were made adopting the mini-international neuropsychiatric interview, using bipolar disorder (BD) patients as controls.ResultsIn our sample (n = 500, of whom, BD-I = 329; BD-II = 70; MDD = 101), using a cut-off of 17 allowed the HCL-32-R2 to discriminate DSM-IV-defined MDD patients between “true unipolar” (HCL-32-R2−) and “sub-threshold bipolar depression” (HCL-32-R2+) with sensitivity = 82% and specificity = 77%. Area under the curve was .883; positive and negative predictive values were 93.44% and 73.23% respectively. Owing to clinical interpretability considerations and consistency with previous adaptations of the HCL-32, a two-factor solution (F1=”hyperactive/elated” vs. F2=”irritable/distractible/impulsive”) was preferred using exploratory and confirmatory factors analyses. Item n.33 (“I gamble more”) and n.34 (“I eat more”) introduced in the R2 version of the HCL-32 loaded onto F1, though very slightly. Cronbach’s alphas were F1 = .86 and F2 = .60.LimitationsNo cross-validation with any additional validated screening tool. Inpatients only sample; recall bias; no systematic evaluation of eventual medical/psychiatric comorbidities, current/lifetime pharmacological history, or record of severity of current MDE.ConclusionsIn our sample, the HCL-32 fairly discriminated between MDD and BD-I but not BD-II, therefore soliciting for replication studies for use in Arabic-speaking depressed inpatients.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Comprehensive Psychiatry - Volume 59, May 2015, Pages 141–150
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,