Recent consensus on the classification of rhinosinusitis — a way forward for research and practice?

Prior classification of rhinitis was into three categories: acute, subacute and chronic rhinosinusitis. The advantages of this classification were obvious but they were offset by some disadvantages. For example, the previous classifi cation did not take account of the mechanisms underlying the condition or the clinical outcome. Hence, there was a need for evidence-based sinusitis classification guidelines. The American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and other related societies published a classif cation of the condition and suggested clinical research strategies for patients with rhinosinusitis. The main conclusion was that sinusitis should be divided into four categories: acute (bacterial) rhinosinusitis, chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) without polyps, CRS with polyps, and allergic fungal sinusitis. The aim of this current paper is to discuss the consensus for nomenclature, outline the proposed classif cation of different types of rhinosinusitis and to suggest some ways that we may audit these guidelines.