کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3239016 1205980 2016 4 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Dynamic locking plate vs. simple cannulated screws for nondisplaced intracapsular hip fracture: A comparative study
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
صفحه قفل پویا در مقابل پیچ های کانولای ساده برای شکستگی لگن داخل شکمی غیرقابل جابجایی: یک مطالعه مقایسه ای
کلمات کلیدی
شکستگی لگن داخل شکمی غیرقابل جابجایی؛ Targon FN؛ پیچ کانولیتد
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی طب اورژانس
چکیده انگلیسی

IntroductionIntracapsular hip fractures (ICHF) are a common cause of morbidity and mortality and pose a great economic burden on the health care systems. Appropriate surgical treatment requires balancing optimal outcomes with the cost of treatment to the health care system. While in elderly patients with displaced ICHF arthroplasty became the standard of care, the internal fixation method for conserving the femoral head in younger patients or in nondisplaced ICHF is still in debate. We compared a dynamic locking plate with the standard cancellous cannulated screws (CCS) for treatment of nondisplaced ICHF.MethodsAll patients treated with internal fixation for nondisplaced ICHF between July 2009 and December 2012 at our level one trauma center were included in this study. Patients treated with Targon FN (Aesculap) implants and CCS (Synthes) were compared. Charts were reviewed for demographics, intraoperative data and peri/post operative complications retrospectively. Radiographical analysis, pain (VAS), quality of life (SF12) and function (MHHS) data were prospectively gathered.ResultsOne hundred and fifteen non-displaced ICHFs were treated with internal fixation, 81 with CCS and 34 with Targon FN implant; the mean follow-up was 19 and 28 months, respectively. Group fracture characteristics (Garden/Powel classification), and demographics, excluding age, were not significantly different. Post-operative revision rates of the Targon FN and CCS groups, perioperative complications were not statistically different (p > 0.05). Quality of life (SF-12), function (Modified Harris Hip Score) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores were not statistical different.ConclusionsComplication rates and clinical outcomes for the treatment of nondisplaced ICHF with Targon FN and SCC showed no significant differences. Based on this evidence in consideration of the substantial cost differential between the Targon FN and SCC we suggest SCC for treatment of nondisplaced ICHF.Level of EvidenceIII

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Injury - Volume 47, Issue 2, February 2016, Pages 424–427
نویسندگان
, , , , , ,