ACL reconstruction in sports active people: Transtibial DB technique with ST/G vs. transtibial SB technique with BPTB: Preliminary results

The single-bundle ACL reconstruction ensures good outcomes and it is a well-established and widespread technique. Nevertheless, some patients still present residual pain and instability. Recent studies have showed that the double-bundle technique restores better natural ACL-fitting kinematics. Long-term clinical studies comparing the two surgical techniques are not frequent and there is no instrument to evaluate function and kinematics during the knee rotation in vivo.In this randomised prospective study performed on sportive people, we compare the BPTB single-bundle ACL reconstruction technique, which is the most common surgical technique performed on these patients’ category, with the ACL double-bundle reconstruction technique (DB), in order to evaluate possible differences between the groups.Comparing the two groups, no statistically significant difference regarding the post-operative Lysholm score (p = 0.368) the Tegner activity scale (p = 0.519) and the arthrometric evaluation with KT-1000 (p = 0.74) have been observed. On the contrary, the IKDC evaluation showed a statistically significant difference (p = 0.004) better results of the DB group. Moreover, as assessed by the Tegner activity scale, only patients of the DB group were able to return to sports at a pre-injury level.Our data suggest that the double bundle ST/G ACL reconstruction technique results into slightly better outcome than the traditional technique of single-bundle BPTB. The verification and quantification of the advantages of this technique is anticipated with future studies focusing to the accurate measurement of knee rotation during different activities.