کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3304827 1210342 2012 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Diagnostic yield of malignancy during EUS-guided FNA of solid lesions with and without a stylet: a prospective, single blind, randomized, controlled trial
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی بیماری‌های گوارشی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Diagnostic yield of malignancy during EUS-guided FNA of solid lesions with and without a stylet: a prospective, single blind, randomized, controlled trial
چکیده انگلیسی

BackgroundUse of a stylet during EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA) is believed to improve the quality and diagnostic yield of specimens.ObjectiveTo compare samples obtained by EUS-FNA with (S+) and without (S−) a stylet for diagnostic yield of malignancy and cytological characteristics.DesignRandomized, controlled trial.SettingTertiary referral center.PatientsConsecutive patients referred for EUS-FNA of solid lesions.InterventionEUS-FNA; the number of passes was determined by lesion site (6 pancreas/others and 4 lymph nodes).Main Outcome MeasurementsDiagnostic yield of malignancy and degree of cellularity, specimen adequacy, contamination, and amount of blood.ResultsOne hundred patients were prospectively enrolled in this randomized, controlled trial and the sites of EUS-FNA were the pancreas, 58; lymph node, 25; and other, 17. The overall diagnosis was malignancy in 56, benign in 30, suspicious/atypical in 7, and inadequate specimen in 7 lesions. There were 550 passes made (275 with a stylet and 275 without a stylet). Interim analysis demonstrated no difference in the diagnostic yield of malignancy (94 passes with a stylet [34.2%] vs 110 without a stylet [40%], P = .2) and in the proportion of inadequate specimens (57 with a stylet [20.7%] vs 64 without a stylet [23.3%], P = .2). There was no difference with regard to cellularity (P = .83), contamination (P = .31), number of cells (P = .25), and amount of blood (P = .6). Similar results were noted in a subgroup analysis based on lesion site. Applying the rules of futility, the study was terminated.LimitationsSubjectivity in cytopathologists' assessment, endosonographer not blinded.ConclusionsThere was no difference in the diagnostic yield of malignancy or proportion of inadequate specimens between passes with and without a stylet. These results suggest that the use of a stylet does not confer any advantage during EUS-FNA. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01316614.)

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy - Volume 76, Issue 2, August 2012, Pages 328–335
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,