Femoro-tibial knee osteoarthritis: One or two X-rays? Results from a population-based study

ObjectiveOur objective was to compare the use of both anteroposterior (AP) extended-knee X-ray and semi-flexed X-ray (current gold standard) versus the use of semi-flexed X-ray alone to detect femoro-tibial osteoarthritis (OA).MethodsIndividuals 40 to 75 years of age with symptomatic hip and/or knee OA (Kellgren/Lawrence [KL] score ≥ 2) were recruited using a multiregional prevalence survey in France. Both AP and schuss X-rays were performed and read; two years later, the same examiner, blinded to the results of the first reading, performed a second reading of the schuss X-ray. We compared the KL stages of each knee and analyzed osteophyte detection and localization, joint space narrowing (JSN), and the relationship to obesity.ResultsThe analysis included 350 participants with OA of various stages. Comparing the two readings showed that a higher proportion of patients had KL ≥ 2 when the two X-ray views were combined (right knee: P < 0.0001; left knee: P < 0.001). There were no differences when using the schuss X-ray alone versus in combination with an AP X-ray in terms of detecting JSN, osteophytes. A comparison of schuss X-ray alone versus AP X-ray alone demonstrated the superiority of the schuss view for evaluating JSN (P = 0.0001 and P = 0.0001) and no difference in osteophyte detection.ConclusionOur study shows that the schuss view alone was sufficient for detecting knee osteophytes and JSN. Using one X-ray rather than two will reduce medical costs and irradiation burden. Using two views seems preferable for epidemiological studies.