In vivo comparative efficacy of three surgical hand preparation agents in reducing bacterial count

SummaryBackgroundBesides objective efficacy, the choice between an antiseptic-based liquid soap, or an alcohol-based hand rub for surgical hand preparation technique is based on personal preference. Glycerol is often added to the formulations in order to enhance tolerability; however, it has been recently reported as a factor reducing the sustained effect of surgical hand rubs.AimTo compare the efficacies of three commercial products for hand decontamination.MethodsThe in vivo efficacy of an alcohol-based hand rub (isopropyl alcohol 40%; N-propyl alcohol 25%; glycerin 1.74%; triethanolamine salt of carbomer <1%) was compared with other widely used products in surgical hand antisepsis (chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine). All products were used according to the manufacturers' instructions.FindingsThe best results were achieved with the alcohol-based hand rub and these were sustained for a period of 3 h. Some volunteers experienced skin peeling off the hands when using alcohol-based hand rub; in this group of participants, the bacterial count was reduced only by 0.91 ± 1.67 log10 compared with 2.86 ± 1.22 log10 in the group who did not show this phenomenon.ConclusionBesides confirming the importance of alcohol-based hand rubs for surgical hand decontamination, the results suggest the value of assessing the characteristics, and response of healthcare workers' skin, that may contribute to the development of skin peeling, and the subsequent possibility of a paradoxical overcolonization of hands after surgical preparation with alcohol-based hand rub.