کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
337680 547590 2007 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
DNR Versus DNT: Clinical Implications of a Conceptual Ambiguity: A Case Analysis
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی روانپزشکی و بهداشت روانی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
DNR Versus DNT: Clinical Implications of a Conceptual Ambiguity: A Case Analysis
چکیده انگلیسی

Psychiatrists who practice psychosomatic medicine are routinely called upon to help resolve ethical dilemmas that arise in the care of patients near the end of their lives. Psychosomatic-medicine psychiatrists may be of unique value in these situations because of the clinical insights that we bring to the care of the dying patient. In particular, our subspecialty brings expertise related to the evaluation of decisional capacity of patients who are faced with accepting or declining end-of-life clinical interventions, such as resuscitation and intubation. In this first entry in a new bioethics case series in Psychosomatics, we will lay the groundwork for examining a complex patient case and provide an illustrative analysis of the end-of-life care issues that may be addressed by psychiatrists who practice psychosomatic medicine.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Psychosomatics - Volume 48, Issue 1, January–February 2007, Pages 10–15
نویسندگان
, , , , , ,