کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3392980 1221306 2014 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Stem cell tourism – A web-based analysis of clinical services available to international travellers
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
گردشگری سلول های بنیادی تجزیه و تحلیل مبتنی بر وب از خدمات بالینی در دسترس برای مسافران بین المللی است
کلمات کلیدی
گردشگری سلول های بنیادی، پزشکی سفر منابع آنلاین، گردشگری پزشکی، رفاه بیمار
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری ایمنی شناسی و میکروب شناسی میکروبیولوژی و بیوتکنولوژی کاربردی
چکیده انگلیسی

SummaryBackgroundStem cell therapies are advertised through online resources which describe a range of treatments with diverse clinical indications. Stem cell tourists may not be aware of the information they should seek when consulting these clinics, or of the potential risks involved. The aim of this study was to characterise the therapies offered by online stem cell clinics.MethodsA web based search utilising five search terms was employed. The first twenty pages of each search result were screened against 340 variables.Results224 out of 1091 websites advertised stem cell clinics. 68 eligible sites covering 21 countries were evaluated. The top five clinical indications for stem cell therapy were multiple sclerosis, anti-ageing, Parkinson's disease, stroke and spinal cord injury. Adult, autologous stem cells were the most commonly utilised stem cell, and these were frequently sourced from bone marrow and adipose tissue and administered intravenously. Thirty-four per cent of sites mentioned the number of patients treated while one quarter of clinics provided outcome data. Twenty-nine per cent of clinics had an internationally recognised accreditation. Fifteen per cent of clinics stated that their therapies posed no risk. Eighty-eight per cent of clinics claimed treatment effectiveness, with 16% describing their curative potential. Over 40% of sites did not specify the number or duration of treatments. Fifty-three per cent of clinics requested access to patients' medical records, and 12% recommended patients discuss the proposed therapy with their doctor. No clinic recommended that travellers consult a travel medicine specialist or receive vaccinations prior to their intended travel. One quarter of sites discussed contraindications to treatment, with 41% of sites detailing follow up patient care.ConclusionsThere is potential for stem cell tourists to receive misleading or deficient information from online stem cell clinics. Both the stem cell tourist and travel medicine practitioner should be educated on the potential risks associated with stem cell clinical services advertised online.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease - Volume 12, Issue 6, Part B, November–December 2014, Pages 695–701
نویسندگان
, , ,