کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3443657 1595233 2016 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Implications of immortal person-time when outcomes are nonfatal
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
پیام های جاودانه فرد ـ زمان هنگامی که نتایج مرگبار نیست
کلمات کلیدی
تعصب زمان جاودانه؛ زمان ـ شخص جاویدان؛ همه‌گیرشناسی دارویی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی پزشکی و دندانپزشکی (عمومی)
چکیده انگلیسی

PurposeThe amount of immortal time bias in studies with nonfatal outcomes is unclear. To quantify the magnitude of bias from mishandling of immortal person-time in studies of nonfatal outcomes.MethodsWe derived formulas for quantifying bias from misclassified or excluded immortal person-time in settings with nonfatal outcomes, assuming a constant rate of outcome. In the situation of misclassified or excluded immortal person-time, the quantification includes the immortal time and corresponding events mistakenly attributed to the exposed group (misclassified) or excluded from study (excluded) that must be attributed to the comparison group.ResultsWith misclassified immortal person-time, the magnitude of bias varies according to the incidence rate ratio of immortal time and comparison group as well as the rate ratio of immortal time and exposed group: toward null for both ratios less than 1, no bias for both ratios equal to 1, away from null for both ratios greater than 1. For one ratio less than 1 and the other greater than 1, the direction and magnitude of bias can be obtained from the formula provided. With excluded immortal person-time, the magnitude of bias is associated with the incidence rate ratio of immortal time and comparison group: toward null for the ratio less than 1, no bias for the ratio equal to 1, and away from null for the ratio greater than 1.ConclusionsBias due to immortal person-time in studies with nonfatal outcomes can vary widely and can be quantified under assumptions that apply to many studies.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Annals of Epidemiology - Volume 26, Issue 3, March 2016, Pages 212–217
نویسندگان
, , ,