کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
344530 617426 2016 11 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Filling potholes on the implementation highway: Evaluating the implementation of Parent–Child Interaction Therapy in Los Angeles County
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
پر کردن چاهها در اجرای بزرگراه: ارزیابی اجرای درمان تعامل والدین – کودک در شهرستان های لس آنجلس
کلمات کلیدی
مداخلات مبتنی بر شواهد; پیاده سازی نتایج؛ تسهیل کننده و موانع اجرای; درمان تعامل پدر و مادر – کودک
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی پریناتولوژی (پزشکی مادر و جنین)، طب اطفال و بهداشت کودک
چکیده انگلیسی

In October 2012, first 5 LA funded a unique collaboration between Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health (DMH) and UC Davis PCIT Training Center (UCD PCIT) to train county-contracted agencies to provide Parent–Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT). This $20 million dollar, 5-year grant represented the largest implementation effort of an empirically based treatment to date. The purpose of this paper was to describe the first 2 years of the implementation process of this project, beginning with project start up and pre-implementation phases, and to present agency training and client performance outcomes from our first year of training. Results presented in this evaluation suggest that it is possible to train LA County providers in PCIT, and that PCIT is an effective intervention for DMH-contracted providers in LA County. This evaluation also discusses challenges to successful implementation. Barriers to progress included unanticipated delays building county infrastructure, trainee attrition, and insufficient client referrals. We discuss the results of the current implementation with respect to theory, research, and others’ training models, with the aim of evaluating and prioritizing different implementation drivers, noting the ongoing competition between knowing what to do and the need for action.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Child Abuse & Neglect - Volume 53, March 2016, Pages 40–50
نویسندگان
, , , , , , ,