کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
3447899 | 1595666 | 2016 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
ObjectivesTo comprehend the merits of a Manual Tactile Test (MTT) in assessing hand sensorimotor functions by exploring the relations among 3 subtests along with the precision pinch performances for patients with peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs); and to understand the accuracy of the MTT by constructing the sensitivity and specificity of the test for patients with PNI.DesignCase-control study.SettingHospital and local community.ParticipantsPatients with PNI (n=28) were recruited along with age-, sex-, and handedness-matched healthy controls (n=28) (N=56).InterventionsNot applicable.Main Outcome MeasuresThe Semmes-Weinstein monofilament, moving and static 2-point discrimination, roughness differentiation, stereognosis and barognosis subtests of the MTT, and precision pinch performance were used to examine the sensory and sensorimotor status of the hand.ResultsThe worst results in all sensibility tests were found for the patients with PNI (P<.001) in comparison with the controls. Multiple linear regression analysis showed the MTT was a better indicator for predicting the sensorimotor capacity of hands in the patients with PNI (r2=.189, P=.003) than the traditional test (r2=.088, P=.051). The results of the receiver operating characteristic curve estimation show that the area under the curve was .968 and .959 for the roughness differentiation and stereognosis subtests, respectively, and .853 for the barognosis subtest, therefore revealing the accuracy of the MTT in assessing sensorimotor status for patients with PNI.ConclusionsThis study indicates that the MTT is highly accurate and a significant predictor of sensorimotor performance in hands of patients with PNI. The MTT could therefore help clinicians obtain a better understanding of the sensorimotor and functional status of the hand with nerve injuries.
Journal: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation - Volume 97, Issue 6, June 2016, Pages 983–990