کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3814456 1246016 2007 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Patient willingness to take teriparatide
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی پزشکی و دندانپزشکی (عمومی)
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Patient willingness to take teriparatide
چکیده انگلیسی

ObjectiveTeriparatide [rhPTH (1-34)] is an effective treatment for osteoporosis administered by daily subcutaneous injection. The objective of this study was to determine how much benefit women expect teriparatide to confer before agreeing to perform daily injections.MethodsWe recruited postmenopausal women who had recently undergone bone densitometry and were found to have either a T-score less than −2.5 at the hip or spine and/or had a fracture index (FI) of ≥6. Participants completed an adaptive conjoint analysis questionnaire to determine their treatment preferences.ResultsThe study sample included 185 women, mean age 71 (range 46–90). An increasing number of subjects preferred rhPTH (1-34) as the efficacy of teriparatide increased, but most women demanded efficacy advantages greater than those demonstrated in clinical studies. We found no association between absolute fracture risk and preference for rhPTH (1-34); however, subjects with an excessively high perceived risk of future fracture were more likely to accept daily subcutaneous injections compared to subjects with a lower perceived risk of future fracture (40% versus 15%, p = 0.001).ConclusionOur results suggest that most women demand benefits far greater than those conferred by rhPTH (1-34) in order to administer daily subcutaneous injections to decrease their future risk of fractures.Practice implicationsGiven the poor adherence for treatment of osteoporosis, and the choices older adults must make when paying for medications, development of novel treatment approaches should be based on older adults’ treatment preferences.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Patient Education and Counseling - Volume 65, Issue 2, February 2007, Pages 237–244
نویسندگان
, , ,