کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
385433 | 660865 | 2011 | 12 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

Compressive strength and splitting tensile strength are both mechanical properties of concrete that are utilized in structural design. This study presents gene expression programming (GEP) as a new tool for the formulations of splitting tensile strength from compressive strength of concrete. For purpose of building the GEP-based formulations, 536 experimental data have been gathered from existing literature. The GEP-based formulations are developed for splitting tensile strength of concrete as a function of age of specimen and cylinder compressive strength. In experimental parts of this study, cylindrical specimens of 150 × 300 mm and 100 × 200 mm in dimensions are utilized. Training and testing sets of the GEP-based formulations are randomly separated from the complete experimental data. The GEP-based formulations are also validated with additional 173 data of experimental results other than the data used in training and testing sets of the GEP-based formulations. All of the results obtained from the GEP-based formulations are compared with the results obtained from experimental data, the developed regression-based formulation and formulas given by some national building codes. These comparisons showed that the GEP-based formulations appeared to well agree with the experimental data and found to be quite reliable.
► This study presents GEP as a new tool for the formulations of splitting tensile strength from cylinder compressive strength of concrete.
► The GEP formulations are developed for splitting tensile strength of concrete as a function of age of specimen and cylinder compressive strength.
► All of the results obtained from the GEP formulations are compared with the results obtained from experimental data, the developed regression-based formulation, and some national building codes.
► These comparisons showed that the GEP formulations appeared to well agree with the experimental data and found to be quite reliable.
Journal: Expert Systems with Applications - Volume 38, Issue 11, October 2011, Pages 14257–14268