کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
3920575 | 1599828 | 2012 | 5 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
ObjectivesTo determine the views of UK women and obstetricians relating to induction of labour at term for women over 35 years of age.Study designCross-sectional web-based survey sent to members of the British Maternal and Fetal Medicine Society (BMFMS) and pregnant or recently delivered members of a large social network site for parents (www.mumsnet.com). One hundred and twenty-eight consultant obstetrician members of BMFMS and 663 pregnant or recently delivered women responded.ResultsTwo hundred and eighty-eight women (43%) would consider induction of labour for maternal age alone, and 192 women (29%) would consider participating in a randomised trial of induction of labour at term versus expectant management in a future pregnancy. Three percent (n = 4) of consultant obstetricians offer induction of labour at term to women at 35–39 years of age, 37% (n = 47) to women at 40–44 years of age and 55% (n = 70) to those over 45 years. Sixty-one consultants (48%) would participate in a trial to test the effect of a policy of induction for nulliparous women over 35 years old.ConclusionsThe policy of offering induction of labour at term for advanced maternal age is widespread and a significant percentage of women consider it to be a valid indication.
Journal: European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology - Volume 162, Issue 2, June 2012, Pages 144–148