کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3929053 1253215 2006 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Is Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Necessary in Patients with a Serum PSA < 10 ng/ml Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer?
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی زنان، زایمان و بهداشت زنان
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Is Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Necessary in Patients with a Serum PSA < 10 ng/ml Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer?
چکیده انگلیسی

ObjectiveControversy persists concerning the role of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in patients with preoperative PSA values <10 ng/ml undergoing treatment for prostate cancer with a curative intent. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of lymph node metastasis in this subgroup of patients.MethodsPatients with clinically localized prostate cancer and a serum PSA < 10 ng/ml, without neoadjuvant hormonal or radiotherapy, with negative staging examinations who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy with bilateral extended PLND and with ≥10 lymph nodes detected by the pathologist in the surgical specimen, were included in the study.ResultsA total of 231 patients with a median serum PSA of 6.7 ng/ml (range 0.4–9.98) and a median age of 62 years (range 44–76) were evaluated. A median of 20 (range 10–72) nodes were removed per patient. Positive nodes were found in 26 of 231 patients (11%), the majority of which (81%) had a Gleason score ≥7 in the surgical specimen. Of the patients with a Gleason score ≥7 in the prostatectomy specimen 25% had positive nodes, whereas only 3% with a Gleason score ≤6 were node positive.ConclusionsThe incidence of positive nodes in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer, a serum PSA < 10 ng/ml and a Gleason score ≥7 in the prostatectomy specimen was 25% after extended PLND. It seems that in this patient group extended PLND, including removal of nodes along the internal iliac vessels, is warranted.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: European Urology - Volume 50, Issue 2, August 2006, Pages 272–279
نویسندگان
, , , , ,