کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
3974641 | 1257006 | 2008 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

SummaryMedications are used rarely in newborn resuscitations and are probably justifiable in less than 0.1% of births. Doses used are mainly extrapolated from animal and adult data. Despite this, the drugs used, their order and route of administration have all been sources of controversy for many years. There have been polarised views, often focusing upon adrenaline and sodium bicarbonate and more recently new drugs such as vasopressin have been suggested, once again extrapolating from adult experience. This article examines the sparse data behind the use of any medication at birth and the poor outcome data available. The appropriate decline in the indiscriminate use of volume expansion is considered and balanced by the increasing evidence in favour of delayed clamping of the umbilical cord. Focusing on the basic steps of resuscitation, improving the quality of their application and avoiding relative hypovolaemia, must improve the quality of outcome data. The place of medications in newborn resuscitation should be regarded as experimental and still requires evidence to justify their use especially in premature babies.
Journal: Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine - Volume 13, Issue 6, December 2008, Pages 416–423