Comparison of 4 Femoral Tunnel Drilling Techniques in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to determine which femoral tunnel drilling technique most closely reproduces the anatomic femoral footprint and has acceptable tunnel length and tunnel orientation.MethodsWe divided 20 cadaveric knees into 4 equal groups. Arthroscopically, the anatomic femoral footprint was marked with an awl as the tunnel starting point. In group 1 the femoral tunnel was drilled through a tibial tunnel. In groups 2 and 3 the femoral tunnel was drilled through the anteromedial arthroscopy portal, with a rigid drill and flexible drill, respectively. In group 4 the femoral tunnel was drilled with the outside-in technique over a pin positioned with an arthroscopic femoral guide. Measurements of the tunnel length, aperture, and placement were taken from 3-dimensional computed tomography scans.ResultsTunnel length for groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 averaged 42.08 mm, 37.73 mm, 28.92 mm, and 31.96 mm (P = .039). The mean coronal angle of the tunnels as measured from the line tangent to the posterior femoral condyles was 63.30°, 61.22°, 51.77°, and 45.00° (P = .007), and the mean distance from the inferior articular surface to the edge of the tunnel was 5.60 mm, 4.36 mm, 2.42 mm, and –0.63 mm (P = .008) for groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. There was no statistical difference in footprint length, width, area, or distance from the posterior articular margin.ConclusionDrilling by the transtibial technique produces the most vertical and longest tunnels. Independent drilling techniques produce the most anatomic tunnels but at the expense of tunnel length.Clinical RelevanceWhen the orthopaedic surgeon is performing ACL reconstruction, it is critical to achieve anatomic placement of the graft, as well as maintain appropriate tunnel length.