کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4047611 | 1603600 | 2007 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
A Biomechanical Comparison of the Modified Mason-Allen Stitch and Massive Cuff Stitch In Vitro
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت
پزشکی و دندانپزشکی
ارتوپدی، پزشکی ورزشی و توانبخشی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله

چکیده انگلیسی
Purpose: The suture-tendon interface is generally regarded as the weak link in rotator cuff fixation. High rates of failure in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair have led to a search for strong yet easy-to-perform suture configurations. The goal of this study was to compare the strength of 2 commonly used suture configurations, the modified Mason-Allen stitch and the massive cuff stitch, when suture-anchored into bone. Methods: Fourteen sheep shoulders were harvested and the infraspinatus tendon isolated. Each infraspinatus tendon was split in half longitudinally along the axis of its fibers to yield 2 tendon-bone specimens per shoulder, for a total of 28 specimens. Each split tendon was then repaired by use of a double-loaded suture anchor with a modified Mason-Allen and simple suture in one specimen and the massive cuff stitch in the other. Each specimen was initially cyclically loaded on a vertical MTS uniaxial load frame (MTS Systems, Eden Prairie, MN) under force control from 5 to 30 N at 0.25 Hz for 20 cycles. Each specimen was then loaded to failure under displacement control at a rate of 1 mm/s. Peak-to-peak displacement, cyclic elongation, ultimate tensile load, stiffness, and mode of failure were recorded. A repeated-measures analysis of variance was performed, with an α level of significance set at P < .05. Results: No statistically significant difference was found with regard to ultimate load to failure between the modified Mason-Allen stitch (110.4 ± 55.1 N) and massive cuff stitch (116.4 ± 37.9 N). In addition, no statistically significant difference was found with regard to cyclic elongation, peak-to-peak displacement, or initial displacement. The most common mode of failure for both suture configurations was suture pullout. Conclusions: The modified Mason-Allen stitch and massive cuff stitch yield similar biomechanical profiles when suture-anchored into bone. Clinical Relevance: The massive cuff stitch may be a simpler and biomechanically equivalent alternative to the modified Mason-Allen stitch in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery - Volume 23, Issue 3, March 2007, Pages 235-240.e2
Journal: Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery - Volume 23, Issue 3, March 2007, Pages 235-240.e2
نویسندگان
Michael J. M.D., Charles R. M.D., Cory O. M.D., Frederick B.S., Anand P. D.O.,