Gastrocnemius recession for foot and ankle conditions in adults: Evidence-based recommendations

• Fair evidence supporting the use of gastrocnemius recession for midfoot–forefoot overload syndrome.
• Weak evidence has been found supporting the use of gastrocnemius recession for Achilles tendinopathy and forefoot ulcers.
• Insufficient evidence was found to support gastrocnemius recession for the treatment of Achilles tendinopathy.

BackgroundGastrocnemius recession is a surgical technique commonly performed on individuals who suffer from symptoms related to the restricted ankle dorsiflexion that results when tight superficial posterior compartment musculature causes an equinus contracture. Numerous variations for muscle-tendon unit release along the length of the calf have been described for this procedure over the past century, although all techniques share at least partial or complete release of the gastrocnemius muscle given its role as the primary plantarflexor of the ankle. There exists strong evidence to support the use of this procedure in pediatric patients suffering from cerebral palsy, and increasingly enthusiastic support—but less science—behind its application in treating adult foot and ankle pathologies perceived to be associated with gastrocnemius tightness. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to evaluate currently available evidence for using gastrocnemius recession in three adult populations for whom it is now commonly employed: Achilles tendinopathy, midfoot–forefoot overload syndrome, and diabetic foot ulcers.MethodsA systematic review of the literature was performed on December 21, 2013 using the PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases along with the search term “(gastrocnemius OR gastrocsoleus) AND (recession OR release OR lengthening).” This search generated 1141 results; 12 articles found in the references of these papers were also screened for inclusion. In total, 18 articles met our inclusion criteria. These articles were reviewed and assigned a classification (I–V) of Level of Evidence, according to the criteria recommended by the Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. Based on these classifications, a Grade of Recommendation was assigned for each of the indications of interest.ResultsGrade B evidence-based literature (“fair”) exists to support the use of gastrocnemius recession for the treatment of isolated foot pain due to midfoot/forefoot overload syndrome in adults. There are some data in support of utilizing gastrocnemius recession to treat midfoot or forefoot ulcers and non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy in adults, but to date this evidence remains Grade Cf. Insufficient evidence (Grade I) is currently available to make any recommendation either for or against this procedure for the treatment of insertional Achilles tendinopathy.ConclusionScientific literature continues to grow in support of using isolated gastrocnemius recession as an effective treatment strategy for a variety of lower limb pathologies, although it remains clear that higher evidence levels and more carefully controlled investigations will be necessary to more convincingly define the true efficacy and ideal applications of gastrocnemius recession in the adult population.Level of evidenceLevel IV systematic review.