کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4055982 | 1603850 | 2016 | 6 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
• A protocol using pressure measurements for adapting foot orthoses was developed in RA.
• The protocol led to an additional plantar pressure reduction in the forefoot.
• A definitive clinical trial with health economic analysis is warranted.
ObjectivesImproving foot orthoses (FOs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by using in-shoe plantar pressure measurements seems promising. The objectives of this study were to evaluate (1) the outcome on plantar pressure distribution of FOs that were adapted using in-shoe plantar pressure measurements according to a protocol and (2) the protocol feasibility.MethodsForty-five RA patients with foot problems were included in this observational proof-of concept study. FOs were custom-made by a podiatrist according to usual care. Regions of Interest (ROIs) for plantar pressure reduction were selected. According to a protocol, usual care FOs were evaluated using in-shoe plantar pressure measurements and, if necessary, adapted. Plantar pressure–time integrals at the ROIs were compared between the following conditions: (1) no-FO versus usual care FO and (2) usual care FO versus adapted FO. Semi-structured interviews were held with patients and podiatrists to evaluate the feasibility of the protocol.ResultsAdapted FOs were developed in 70% of the patients. In these patients, usual care FOs showed a mean 9% reduction in pressure–time integral at forefoot ROIs compared to no-FOs (p = 0.01). FO adaptation led to an additional mean 3% reduction in pressure–time integral (p = 0.05). The protocol was considered feasible by patients. Podiatrists considered the protocol more useful to achieve individual rather than general treatment goals. A final protocol was proposed.ConclusionsUsing in-shoe plantar pressure measurements for adapting foot orthoses for patients with RA leads to a small additional plantar pressure reduction in the forefoot. Further research on the clinical relevance of this outcome is required.
Journal: Gait & Posture - Volume 45, March 2016, Pages 45–50