کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4062889 1604040 2011 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Complications After Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty as Compared With Traditional Incision Techniques : A Meta-Analysis
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی ارتوپدی، پزشکی ورزشی و توانبخشی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Complications After Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty as Compared With Traditional Incision Techniques : A Meta-Analysis
چکیده انگلیسی

The primary objective of our meta-analysis was to compare the incidence of complications between minimally invasive surgery and standard total knee arthroplasty (TKA) approaches. We reviewed randomized controlled trials comparing minimally invasive TKA to standard TKA. After testing for publication bias and heterogeneity, the data were aggregated by random effects modeling. Our primary outcome was the number of complications. Our secondary outcomes were alignment outliers, Knee Society Function scores, and Knee Society Knee scores. The combined odds ratios for complications for the minimally invasive surgery group and alignment outliers were 1.58 (95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.47; P < .05) and 0.79 (95% confidence interval, 0.34-1.82; P = .58), respectively. The standard difference in means for Knee Society scores was no different between groups. Minimally invasive knee surgery should be approached with caution.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: The Journal of Arthroplasty - Volume 26, Issue 1, January 2011, Pages 29–35
نویسندگان
, , , , ,