کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4063399 | 1604058 | 2009 | 5 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

A prospective randomized trial comparing hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated and non–HA-coated femoral total hip arthroplasty components was conducted. Sixty-one consecutive patients undergoing primary hip arthroplasty were randomized to receive an identical femoral component with or without HA. Forty-eight hips were available for review at an average of 13 years and 5 months after surgery. The only femoral stem revised was secondary to femoral fracture after mitral valve area. All femoral stems were well fixed on x-ray with no evidence of loosening. There was no statistically significant difference in the revision rates or in the Harris hip score between the HA vs non–HA-coated groups. This study suggests there is no clinical advantage to the use of a hydroxyapatite coating on the femoral component of this design for primary total hip arthroplasty.
Journal: The Journal of Arthroplasty - Volume 24, Issue 1, January 2009, Pages 33–37