Ten-Year Survivorship of Rough-Surfaced Femoral Stem With Geometry Similar to Charnley Femoral Stem

The aim of this study is to review the 10-year results of 269 cemented total hip arthroplasties performed using the Harvard femoral stem with matte surface finish and Charnley stem-like geometry. This is a retrospective cross-sectional survivorship study. We retrospectively reviewed the results of 269 cemented total hip arthroplasties performed using the Harvard femoral stem in 257 patients (men/women 93:164, mean age 71.2 years) between 1990 and 1994. The median duration of follow-up for the surviving implants was 118 (range 60-129) months. Radiographs were reviewed to evaluate the type of osteoarthritis, cement mantle thickness, alignment of the components, presence of aseptic loosening, and radiolucent lines. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards analysis were performed to evaluate 10-year survival and the impact of various radiological parameters on the prosthesis survival respectively. Of the 248 eligible patients (260 hips), 6 patients (7 hips) were lost to follow-up, and 67 patients had died at the time of the study; 36 hips (35 patients) underwent revision surgery for aseptic failure (median duration 60 months, range 12-125 months), and 11 hips were revised for septic failure (median duration 24 months, range 10-53 months from the index procedure). The femoral component was revised in all patients, whereas the acetabular component was revised in 27 patients. Ten-year survival for the femoral and acetabular components using aseptic loosening (with and without revision surgery) as an end point was 77.5% (71.5%-83.5%) and 91.1% (87.2%-95%), respectively. Cox regression analysis did not reveal a statistically significant (P > 0.05) effect of various radiological parameters on survival rate. Our results demonstrate that the matte surface finish femoral component (with geometry similar to Charnley femoral component) has less satisfactory long-term survival rate.