Biomechanical Analysis of Scapholunate Ligament Repair Techniques

PurposeTo evaluate the biomechanical properties of 3 scapholunate repair techniques.MethodsIn 51 cadavers, the scapholunate ligament was exposed through a dorsal approach, incised at its scaphoid insertion, and repaired using 1 of 3 techniques: 2 single-loaded suture anchors, 2 double-loaded suture anchors, or 2 transosseous sutures. Twenty-four repaired specimens underwent load to failure (LTF) testing using tensile distraction on a servo-hydraulic machine. Twenty-seven specimens underwent cyclical testing to measure gap formation at the scapholunate joint.ResultsThe mode of failure was suture pullout through the substance of the ligament in 22 specimens, failure at the bone suture interface in 1, and anchor pullout in 1. Double-loaded anchor repairs demonstrated a significantly higher mean ultimate LTF compared with single-loaded anchor (91 N vs 35 N) and transosseous (91 N vs 60 N) repairs. Transosseous repairs demonstrated a higher mean ultimate LTF compared with single-loaded suture repairs (60 N vs 35 N). After 300 cycles, the average gap for the transosseous repair group was double that for the single- and double-loaded repairs, although not statistically significant.ConclusionsPrimary scapholunate ligament repairs using double-loaded suture anchors demonstrated significantly higher strength compared with single-loaded anchors and transosseous repairs. On cyclic loading, transosseous repairs demonstrated the greatest gap formation with no measurable difference between single- and double-loaded repairs.Clinical relevanceIn a cadaveric model for primary repairs, double-loaded suture anchors demonstrated the highest LTF and offer a similar but unproven performance in vivo.