Comparative Analysis of Biomechanical Performance of Available “Nerve Glues”

PurposeTo compare a variety of potentially useful artificial and biological sealants applied to sutured nerve repairs to decrease gapping at the repaired site.MethodsFifty-seven fresh-frozen cadaveric nerve specimens were transected and repaired with two 8-0 nylon epineural sutures placed 180° apart. The specimens were divided into 5 groups. Four groups received augmentation of the repair with application of either autologous fibrin glue, Tisseel fibrin glue, Evicel fibrin glue, or DuraSeal polyethylene glycol–based hydrogel sealant, and the fifth group had no glue. Each nerve construct was mounted in a servohydraulic materials testing machine and stretched at a constant 5 mm/min displacement rate until failure. A noncontact video analysis permitted normalization of stretch within the repair region. Statistical analysis was performed via analysis of variance followed by Tukey-Kramer post hoc pairwise comparison when indicated.ResultsResistance to gapping as measured through normalized stiffness (N/mm/mm) was greater for the Tisseel group, Evicel group, and DuraSeal group versus the no-glue group only. The stiffness of the autologous group approached significance versus the no-glue group. There were no significant differences in stiffness between any of the nerve glue groups. There was no statistical difference for the peak load at failure between any of the groups.ConclusionsAvoidance of gapping at the nerve repair site is crucial in achieving successful nerve regeneration. Commercially available tissue sealants (Tisseel, Evicel, and DuraSeal), when used to augment 2-suture nerve repairs, as in our protocol, help prevent this initial gapping. None of the tissue sealants tested, however, increased the ultimate load to complete failure of the repair.