کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4068650 | 1604390 | 2012 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

PurposeStress shielding is known to occur around rigidly fixed implants. We hypothesized that stress shielding around radial head prostheses is common but nonprogressive. In this study, we present a classification scheme to support our radiographic observations.MethodsWe reviewed charts and radiographs of 86 cases from 79 patients with radial head implants from both primary and revision surgeries between 1999 and 2009. Exclusion criteria included infection, loosening, or follow-up of less than 12 months. We classified stress shielding as: I, cortical thinning; II, partially (IIa) or circumferentially (IIb) exposed stem; and III, impending mechanical failure.ResultsOf 26 well-fixed stems, 17 (63%) demonstrated stress shielding: I = 2, II = 15 (IIa = 12, IIb = 3), and III = 0. We saw stress shielding with all stem types: cemented or noncemented; long or short; and straight, curved, or tapered. The only significant difference was that stems implanted into the radial shaft had less stress shielding than stems implanted into the neck or tuberosity (P = .03). The average follow-up was 33 months (range, 13–70 mo). Stress shielding was detectable by an average of 11 months (range, 1–15 mo). The pattern of bone loss was similar in 16 of 17 cases (94%), starting on the outer periosteal cortex. The 3 cases with circumferential exposure of the stem (stage IIb) averaged 2.6 mm (range, 1–4 mm) of exposed stem. Stress shielding never extended to the bicipital tuberosity, and there were no cases of impending mechanical failure.ConclusionsStress shielding around radial head prostheses is common, regardless of stem design. However, it is typically minor, nonprogressive, and of questionable clinical consequence.Type of study/level of evidenceTherapeutic IV.
Journal: The Journal of Hand Surgery - Volume 37, Issue 10, October 2012, Pages 2118–2125