کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4073176 1266974 2015 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Patient-specific targeting guides compared with traditional instrumentation for glenoid component placement in shoulder arthroplasty: a multi-surgeon study in 70 arthritic cadaver specimens
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
راهنماهای هدف خاص بیمار در مقایسه با ابزارهای سنتی برای قرارگیری مولکول گلنوئید در آرتروپلاستی شانه: یک مطالعه چند جراح در 70 بیمار آرتریتی
کلمات کلیدی
علوم پایه، تکنیک جراحی آرتروپلاستی شانه ای کل، راهنماهای هدف خاص بیمار، راهنماهای استاندارد، مطالعه کاداور، قرار دادن جزء
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی ارتوپدی، پزشکی ورزشی و توانبخشی
چکیده انگلیسی

Hypothesis and backgroundThe purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of patient-specific guides for total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) with traditional instrumentation in arthritic cadaver shoulders. We hypothesized that the patient-specific guides would place components more accurately than standard instrumentation.Materials and methodsSeventy cadaver shoulders with radiographically confirmed arthritis were randomized in equal groups to 5 surgeons of varying experience levels who were not involved in development of the patient-specific guidance system. Specimens were then randomized to patient-specific guides based off of computed tomography scanning, standard instrumentation, and anatomic TSA or reverse TSA. Variances in version or inclination of more than 10° and more than 4 mm in starting point were considered indications of significant component malposition.ResultsTSA glenoid components placed with patient-specific guides averaged 5° of deviation from the intended position in version and 3° in inclination; those with standard instrumentation averaged 8° of deviation in version and 7° in inclination. These differences were significant for version (P = .04) and inclination (P = .01). Multivariate analysis of variance to compare the overall accuracy for the entire cohort (TSA and reverse TSA) revealed patient-specific guides to be significantly more accurate (P = .01) for the combined vectors of version and inclination. Patient-specific guides also had fewer instances of significant component malposition than standard instrumentation did.ConclusionPatient-specific targeting guides were more accurate than traditional instrumentation and had fewer instances of component malposition for glenoid component placement in this multi-surgeon cadaver study of arthritic shoulders. Long-term clinical studies are needed to determine if these improvements produce improved functional outcomes.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery - Volume 24, Issue 6, June 2015, Pages 965–971
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , ,