Treatment strategies for periprosthetic infections after primary elbow arthroplasty

BackgroundThe goal of this study was to investigate the outcome of different surgical procedures (debridement and retention vs 1- or 2-stage exchange) together with a well-defined antimicrobial regimen.Materials and methodsA total of 236 consecutive patients underwent 262 primary elbow arthroplasties between January 1994 and December 2007. We observed 20 episodes of periprosthetic infections in 19 patients and placed them into 3 groups according to the occurrence of infection after index surgery. A total of 9 early infections (<3 months), 1 delayed infection (3-24 months), and 10 late infections (>24 months) were observed. The treatment among those 3 groups was compared, and the outcome was assessed with a mean follow-up of 60.2 months.ResultsIn the group with early infections (n = 9), 8 cases were treated by irrigation and debridement and 1 case was treated by a 2-stage exchange without recurrence of infection. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score improved from 48.3 points (range, 30-75 points) to 91.7 points (range, 85-100 points). The delayed infection was treated by 1-stage exchange without recurrence of infection. For late infections (n = 10), 3 cases presented recurrence of infection after debridement and irrigation, and the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score remained nearly unchanged, from 60 points (range, 45-80 points) to 65 points (range, 50-80 points). Eradication of infection could be achieved by staged revision and in 3 cases by debridement.ConclusionBoth debridement with retention and staged reimplantation are highly successful for appropriate indications. Staged revisions are successful even against biofilm-active microorganisms, but a prosthesis-free interval of at least 3 months is recommended.