کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4077397 | 1267216 | 2015 | 6 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
• Inpatient vs outpatient ACL reconstruction was compared.
• Pain, readmissions and functional outcomes were compared.
• No significant differences between the study groups were found.
• A simple analgesic protocol is sufficient in outpatient ACL reconstruction.
BackgroundArthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) has traditionally been performed in an inpatient setting. Outpatient treatment may offer the advantages of cost reduction and higher patient satisfaction.Hypothesis/purposeWe investigated whether ACL reconstruction in an outpatient setting is equally safe as in an inpatient setting and whether comparable functional outcomes can be achieved. We hypothesized that the outcomes of outpatient ACL reconstruction result in similar outcomes as inpatient ACL reconstruction.Study designA prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted at one centre.MethodsForty-six patients were randomized to outpatient treatment or a 2-day admission after ACL reconstruction. The functional outcome was evaluated with the Lysholm, Tegner and International Knee Documentation Committee scores. Safety of the procedures was judged according to pain experience and readmission rate. The duration of follow-up was 1 year after ACL reconstruction. The patients were provided with a simple postoperative analgesic protocol. The linear mixed effect model for repeated measures was used for testing the differences between the study groups.ResultsNo significant differences were found between the study groups in all the outcome measures. No readmissions were recorded related to pain. One complication was recorded in the outpatient group versus three in the inpatient group.ConclusionThis study indicates that outpatient care after ACL reconstruction yields comparable functional results and postoperative pain experience as inpatient care and is a safe option. A simple analgesic protocol provides adequate pain relief during the postoperative phase. Level of evidence: I.
Journal: The Knee - Volume 22, Issue 2, March 2015, Pages 111–116