Myringoplasty in children with cleft palate and craniofacial anomaly

ObjectivesAnalyze the anatomical and audiological success rates of myringoplasty in children with craniofacial anomaly, cleft palate and compare them to a control group.MethodsRetrospective review of medical records for all children who underwent myringoplasty between 1997 and 2007. The following data was recorded: sex, age, perforation side, size, location and etiology, surgical approach, type of myringoplasty, graft material, season of surgery, preoperative status of the operated and contralateral ear, history of previous otologic surgery, and adenoidectomy or tonsillectomy.ResultsMyringoplasty outcomes of 22 craniofacial anomaly patients (15/22 were cleft palate patients) were compared to 144 controls. Children in the craniofacial anomaly group demonstrated a tendency towards surgery at an older age. Children in the craniofacial anomaly and cleft palate groups had a significant positive history of previous otologic procedures to both operated and contralateral ears. Peroperative subannular ventilation T-tubes were more frequently recorded in patients with craniofacial anomaly than patients in the control group. The craniofacial anomaly, cleft palate and control group had comparable mean preoperative and postoperative ABG and their ABG improvement was statistically significant. Children with craniofacial anomaly, cleft palate and control group shared similar anatomical and audiological success rates (ABG < 20 dB) at 6, 12 and 24 months.ConclusionsAlthough children in the craniofacial anomaly and cleft palate groups are predisposed to middle ear disease, their disease responds well to surgical intervention. Their audiological and anatomical success rates were equivalent to the ones observed in the control group. In light of our results, we recommend that myringoplasty in children with craniofacial anomaly and cleft palate be performed after the age of 12.