Histology without formalin?

Because formalin is toxic, carcinogenic, and a poor preserver of nucleic acids, for more than 20 years, there have been numerous attempts to find a substitute, with as many different alternative fixatives, none totally successful. With a fast penetration, formaldehyde is a slow and reversible fixative that requires 24 to 48 hours to completely bind to tissue; thus, any surgical specimen arriving to the laboratory between 8 am and 4 pm and processed conventionally for the slides to be ready the following day will be only between 30% and 66% bound and even less fixed when the dehydration starts, resulting in an additional and also incomplete alcoholic fixation. This causes infiltration problems and can affect subsequent tests, especially immunohistochemistry. Formaldehyde fixation is tissue thickness independent between 16 μm and 4 mm but is faster at above room temperature, so the fixation of specimens with less than 24 hours in formalin can be improved if the fixing stations in the conventional tissue processors are set at 40°C. If the safety measures are improved to offer a work environment with a time weighted average level of 0.4 ppm, and the contact with formalin is reduced to a minimum by discouraging its neutralization and limiting the recycling practice to filtering methods, formalin could remain as the routine fixative, with modified methacarn for those specimens requiring nucleic acids studies. This is a preferred solution than having to validate all the standard and special procedures, including those US Food and Drug Administration approved, if formalin is replaced by another fixative without its advantages. To the question posed in the title of this article, the answer is “Yes, it can be done, but that is neither likely nor worth it!”