Preputioplasty associated with urethroplasty for correction of distal hypospadias: A prospective study and proposition of a new objective scoring system for evaluation of esthetic and functional outcome

ObjectiveMost surgical procedures for correction of hypospadias involve the removal of foreskin resulting in a circumcised penis. We report our experience and the medium-term results in the reconstruction of the foreskin during the correction of distal hypospadias.Materials and methodsBetween January 2007 and December 2011, 445 patients aged between 8 and 120 months underwent surgical correction of hypospadias. In 354 out of 445 patients, we performed the reconstruction of the foreskin. Urethroplasty was performed according to either the TIPU (tubularized incised urethral plate urethroplasty; Snodgrass) technique (233/354, 66%) or MAGPI (meatal advancement glanduloplasty incorporated) procedure (121/354, 34%). In 91 out of 445 patients urethroplasty was performed using classic TIPU technique and they were circumcised. The cosmetic and functional results were evaluated using the Hypospadias Objective Penile Evaluation (HOPE) scoring system.ResultsAt a 12 months follow-up, 300 patients (84.7%) had retractable foreskin while 54 patients (15.3%) required postoperative steroid application. We had a total complication rate of 8.7%. As for preputioplasty, 16 patients (4.5%) had partial or total dehiscence of the reconstructed foreskin, one patient was circumcised for persistent phimosis (0.2%). As for urethroplasty complications, we recorded 11 fistulas (3.1%) and three stenosis (0.9%). The complication rate of the control group of circumcised patients was of 3.3% (2 fistulas [2.1%] and 1 stenosis [1.2%]).ConclusionsOur experience shows that foreskin reconstruction can be performed successfully in selected patients with distal hypospadias. However, preputioplasty add an additional 4.7% complication rate. As for the complications of urethroplasty, it seems that preputioplasty does not increase the incidence of complications on the urethra reconstruction. We propose a new objective scoring system (modified HOPE score) for evaluation of esthetic and functional outcome.