Influence of type of conduit and site of implantation on the outcome of continent catheterizable channels

ObjectiveContinent catheterizable channels (CCC) using the Mitrofanoff principle are essential for pediatric urinary tract reconstruction. There is controversy over the influence of type of CCC (appendix vs. Yang–Monti) and site of implantation (augmentation vs. native bladder) on outcome.Patients and methodsA retrospective record review was conducted of all patients undergoing CCC since 1999, excluding patients who underwent seromuscular colocystoplasty. We analyzed the type of channel, site of implantation, complications requiring re-operation, and the revision rate according to type of CCC, type of stoma, site of implantation (bladder vs. augmentation) and segment used for augmentation (ileum vs. sigmoid colon).ResultsThere were 41 patients with a mean age of 11.2 years and a mean follow-up of 33.3 months. Of these, 33 CCC were constructed with appendix and eight with a Yang–Monti technique (4 ileal, 4 sigmoid); 31 patients also had an enterocystoplasty (19 sigmoid, 9 ileal and 3 others). Overall revision rate was 27%; revision was required in 8/33 (24%) appendiceal and 3/8 (38%) Yang–Monti CCC (P = 0.7). Revisions were required in 4/21 CCC implanted in the native bladder and 7/20 implanted in augmented bladder (P = 0.3). The majority of revisions were at skin level.ConclusionsAlthough there was no statistical difference in revision rate according to type of CCC, type of stoma or site of implantation, complications appeared to be more common in patients requiring a more complex reconstruction.