کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4210384 | 1280585 | 2012 | 7 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

SummaryWe compare the adequacy of several titration procedures of oxygen flow in maintaining SpO2 > 90% during the activities of daily life in patients with very severe COPD.Thirty-one very severe COPD patients undergoing oxygen-therapy were recruited. Three titration methods were randomly performed: (1) 6-min walking tests; (2) cycle-ergometer constant work-rate tests at a load equivalent to 12 ml/min/kg of oxygen uptake; (3) one single constant work-rate test at 40 W 12-h pulse-oximeter monitoring was performed on four consecutive days with the following oxygen flow during exercise: 1 l·min−1 above the resting prescription (NOTT guidelines) and those established by the titration procedures.The time spent SpO2 < 90% was higher for the titration based on NOTT and walking tests than for the oxygen flow established by the constant work-rate tests at 12 ml O2/min/kg (22.1 ± 18.7, 20.8 ± 19.5 and 6.7 ± 12.7%, respectively). As for the oxygen uptake-based titration, the simplified procedure (a single exercise test at 40 w) generates longer times spent SpO2 < 90% and SpO2 < 85%, although it maintains a SpO2 > 90% for more 90% of the time.In COPD patients, exercise oxygen flow titrations by NOTT guidelines or walking tests do not allow a suitable oxygenation during the activities of daily life. Two more adequate alternative methods, based on constant work-rate tests, are proposed.
Journal: Respiratory Medicine - Volume 106, Issue 11, November 2012, Pages 1544–1550