The prevalence of airflow obstruction in rural primary care

SummarySpirometry has been reported to be under-utilized, and airflow obstruction may be under-diagnosed, in primary care practice.Study objectivesThe objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and severity of airflow obstruction in rural primary care settings and the degree to which it can be predicted by clinical characteristics. Spirometry was performed in patients 35 years and older who had smoked, presenting for any reason to one of eight rural primary care practices. Obstruction was defined as an FEV1/FVC<0.70. A total of 1046 subjects were recruited of whom 1034 had acceptable and reproducible spirometry. Airflow obstruction was detected in 17.4% (180 patients). Of those with obstruction, 77.2% (se 3.1%) had at least one respiratory symptom versus 62.4% (se 1.6%) without obstruction (P=0.0002P=0.0002). Only 44.9% (se 3.7%) of those with airflow obstruction had been previously diagnosed with obstructive lung disease. Of those with an FEV1<50% of predicted, 85% (se 5.6%) were breathless on exertion; however, only 63% (se 7.6%) were being treated with respiratory medications. We conclude that airflow obstruction is common in rural primary care practice and cannot be accurately predicted by symptoms. It is undiagnosed half of the time, and often not treated even when symptomatic.