Detrusor wall thickness compared to other non-invasive methods in diagnosing men with bladder outlet obstruction: A prospective controlled study

IntroductionThe current study aims to compare the diagnostic accuracy of detrusor wall thickness to other noninvasive, tools, using pressure flow studies as a reference, in the assessment of bladder outlet, obstruction among men presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms.Patients and MethodsMen aged 50 or older presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms were evaluated for bladder outlet, obstruction using detrusor wall thickness (measured by a transabdominal 7.5 MHz ultrasound) and, other non-invasive tools (namely uroflowmetry, post-void residual, and prostate volume), and the results were compared to pressure flow study.ResultsDetrusor wall thickness ranged from 0.7 mm to 7 mm (mean ± SD of 2.39 ± 1.64 mm), and 21 patients, were classified as obstructed (thickness ≥ 2 mm). Based on pressure flow study 23 patients had, bladder outlet obstruction. Detrusor wall thickness had the highest accuracy (88.0%), the highest, specificity (92.6%) and the highest positive predictive value (90.5%) among the non-invasive tests.ConclusionsDetrusor wall thickness measurement can be used to diagnose and quantify bladder outlet obstruction, non-invasively in men with lower urinary tract symptoms, with an accuracy approaching that of the standard pressure flow studies.