The impact of robotic cholecystectomy on private practice in a community teaching hospital

BackgroundRecently, through aggressive marketing, robotic cholecystectomy has been gaining popularity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of this technology on private practice and hospital cost and volume.methodsFrom November 2012 to April 2014, all elective cholecystectomies were evaluated for procedure type, operative time (OR), insurance type and payment, hospital length of stay, and volume. Data were analyzed using the Chi-square test, Student t test and the Mann-Whitney U test.ResultsOf 338 patients, 246 had complete financial records. Of these patients, 84.1% (207) patients were female with mean age of 45.4 ± 17.1 years. Patients were divided into 2 groups; group 1: 220(89.4%) patients had laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and group 2: 26(10.6%) patients had robotic cholecystectomy (RC). The mean direct cost was higher in the robotic group $2,704.08 ± 308.40 vs $1,712.51 ± 379.50; P < .0001. The median gross margin; however, was not statically different (RC: $1,593.00 (Interquartile range $3,936) vs LC: $1,726.00 (Interquartile range $1,480); P = .85). Both case time and OR were higher in the robotic group; case time (RC: 121 ± 15.4 vs LC: 98.4 ± 27.5 minutes, P < .0001); OR (RC: 86.6 ± 14.3 vs LC: 63.9 ± 25.9 minutes, P < .0001). There was no appreciable change over time in either surgeon or hospital volume.ConclusionsThere was a statistically significant increase in direct cost in RC vs. LC but not in margin. There was no impact in private practice on the number of cases being done robotically, nor there was an increase in hospital volume. This analysis did not include the purchase cost or maintenance of the robot.