Continuity of care in general surgery resident education

• The operative resident was involved in 9.2% of preoperative consultations.
• The operative resident was involved in 9.0% of initial follow-up visits.
• No operative resident saw the patient both preoperatively and for follow-up.

BackgroundLack of continuity of care for patients managed by general surgery residents is a commonly recognized problem but objective data evaluating its incidence are limited. The goal of this pilot study was to determine the extent to which senior residents at a large American urban academic center participate in the full course of care for patients on whom they operate.MethodsTwo hundred twenty-eight total cases performed between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2012 were reviewed and the operative senior resident was noted: laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 50), breast lumpectomy (n = 33), thyroidectomy (n = 50), laparoscopic appendectomy (n = 50), and open partial colectomy (n = 45). Frequency of operative resident involvement in the initial preoperative clinic visit, initial postoperative visit, or both (the entire course of care) was recorded.ResultsOverall rate of operative resident involvement was 9.2% for the initial preoperative consultation, 9.0% for the initial follow-up visit, and 0% for the entire course of a patient’s care. Residents were on service for greater than 40 days, whereas the average total duration of care for an individual patient was 26 days.ConclusionsThe results of this pilot study suggest that continuity of care among general surgery residents is lacking and cannot be entirely accounted for by rotation-specific time constraints. Further research is needed to identify and validate effective curricular strategies for improving opportunities to participate in this essential experience.