A population-based comparison of open versus minimally invasive abdominoperineal resection

BackgroundAlthough minimally invasive colorectal surgery increases widely, outcomes following its use in complex operations such as the abdominoperineal resection (APR) remain indeterminate.MethodsA review of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2008 to 2011) of all patients undergoing elective laparoscopic or open APR was conducted. Risk-adjusted 30-day outcomes were assessed using regression modeling accounting for patient characteristics, comorbidities, and surgical procedure.ResultsWe identified 3,191 admissions meeting inclusion criteria (1,019 laparoscopic; 2,172 open). The conversion rate was 5%. Mortality was low and similar between groups (.88% vs .83%, P = .91). In-hospital complication rates were lower in the laparoscopic group (19% vs 29%, odds ratio .59, 95% confidence interval .49 to .71, P < .01), but conversion was associated with a higher rate (29% vs 18%, P < .01). Finally, a laparoscopic APR was associated with a shorter length of stay (5.3 vs 7.0 days, P < .01).ConclusionLaparoscopic APR is associated with improved outcomes and may be the preferred approach by surgeons with appropriate skills and experience.