Body mass index in blunt trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock: opposite ends of the body mass index spectrum portend poor outcome

BackgroundThere are controversial data on the relationship between trauma and body mass index. We investigated this relationship in traumatic hemorrhagic shock.MethodsThe “Glue Grant” database was analyzed, stratifying patients into underweight, normal weight (NW), overweight, Class I obesity, Class II obesity, and Class III obesity. Predictors of mortality and surgical interventions were statistically determined.ResultsOne thousand nine hundred seventy-six patients were included with no difference in injury severity between groups. Marshall's score was elevated in overweight (5.3 ± 2.7, P = .016), Class I obesity (5.8 ± 2.7, P < .001), Class II obesity (5.9 ± 2.8, P < .001), and Class III obesity (6.3 ± 3.0, P < .001) compared with NW (4.8 ± 2.6). Underweight had higher lactate (4.8 ± 4.2 vs 3.3 ± 2.5, P = .04), were 4 times more likely to die (odds ratio 3.87, confidence interval 2.22 to 6.72), and were more likely to undergo a laparotomy (odds ratio 2.06, confidence interval 1.31 to 3.26) than NW.ConclusionEarly assessment of body mass index, with active management of complications in each class, may reduce mortality in traumatic hemorrhagic shock.