کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4279915 | 1611548 | 2010 | 7 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

BackgroundAlthough mammography is the gold standard for breast cancer screening, clinical breast examination (CBE) and self breast examination (SBE) are important adjuncts whose utility has been questioned.MethodsA retrospective review of invasive breast cancer patients from 2000 to 2008 was performed. We compared 3 groups: breast cancer detected by (1) imaging only (nonpalpable) or palpable mass with a normal mammogram (2) ≥1 year (mammogram ≥1 year) or (3) <1 year (mammogram <1 year).ResultsOf 1,222 women, presentation included 67% nonpalpable, 21% mammogram ≥1 year, and 13% mammogram <1 year. Patients presenting with palpable masses on SBE or CBE even with a normal mammogram within 1 year tended to have more aggressive tumors (larger size, lymph node positive, and triple-negative disease) resulting in more aggressive therapy (a higher mastectomy rate and a greater likelihood of chemotherapy).ConclusionA significant number of women present with palpable breast cancer within 1 year of a normal mammogram, many with an aggressive cancer. Therefore, we continue to advocate SBE and CBE for breast cancer screening.
Journal: The American Journal of Surgery - Volume 200, Issue 6, December 2010, Pages 712–718