Randomized controlled study: radiofrequency coagulation and plication versus ligation and excision technique for rectal mucosal prolapse

BackgroundA novel technique of radiofrequency ablation and plication of the rectal mucosa (RAMP) as a treatment for rectal mucosal prolapse is reported. The results of this technique are compared with the conventional ligature and excision procedure (LEP).MethodsRadiofrequency ablation was performed using an Ellman radiofrequency generator. Patients with rectal mucosal prolapse were randomized to undergo either LEP or RAMP. The intra- and postoperative outcomes and complications were recorded.ResultsRAMP on average resulted in reduced operation time, shorter hospitalization, and significantly less postoperative pain. Return to work was earlier and wound healing times were shorter than that of patients in the control group. The complication rates also were significantly shorter (9% in the RAMP group and 29% in the conventional LEP group).ConclusionThe procedure of radiofrequency ablation and plication of rectal mucosa is safe, effective, and swift. It can be proposed as an effective alternative to conventional surgical procedures.