کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4285913 1611980 2015 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Five year experience in management of perforated peptic ulcer and validation of common mortality risk prediction models – Are existing models sufficient? A retrospective cohort study
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
تجربه پنج ساله در مدیریت زخم پپتیک سوراخ شده و اعتبار پیش بینی مدل پیش بینی خطر مرگ و میر مشترک چیست؟ آیا مدل های موجود کافی هستند؟ یک مطالعه کوهورت گذشته نگر
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی عمل جراحی
چکیده انگلیسی


• Early presentation, prompt diagnosis and emergent surgery are the pillars to successful management and good outcomes of PPU.
• To provide optimal care, it is important to stratify patients into high and low risk of mortality, ideally prior to surgery.
• All the four MRPMs tested had a similar moderate accuracy for mortality prediction in our experience.
• There is a potential for improvement of existing MRPMs; especially due to geographic and demographic diversity.
• MPI is the only scoring system which predicts all – intra-abdominal collection, leak, re-operation and mortality.

BackgroundEmergency surgery for perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Accurate and early risk stratification is important. The primary aim of this study is to validate the various existing MRPMs and secondary aim is to audit our experience of managing PPU.Methods332 patients who underwent emergency surgery for PPU at a single intuition from January 2008 to December 2012 were studied. Clinical and operative details were collected. Four MRPMs: American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score, Boey's score, Mannheim peritonitis index (MPI) and Peptic ulcer perforation (PULP) score were validated.ResultsMedian age was 54.7 years (range 17–109 years) with male predominance (82.5%). 61.7% presented within 24 h of onset of abdominal pain. Median length of stay was 7 days (range 2–137 days). Intra-abdominal collection, leakage, re-operation and 30-day mortality rates were 8.1%, 2.1%, 1.2% and 7.2% respectively. All the four MRPMs predicted intra-abdominal collection and mortality; however, only MPI predicted leak (p = 0.01) and re-operation (p = 0.02) rates. The area under curve for predicting mortality was 75%, 72%, 77.2% and 75% for ASA score, Boey's score, MPI and PULP score respectively.Discussion and conclusionEmergency surgery for PPU has low morbidity and mortality in our experience. MPI is the only scoring system which predicts all – intra-abdominal collection, leak, reoperation and mortality. All four MRPMs had a similar and fair accuracy to predict mortality, however due to geographic and demographic diversity and inherent weaknesses of exiting MRPMs, quest for development of an ideal model should continue.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: International Journal of Surgery - Volume 14, February 2015, Pages 38–44
نویسندگان
, , , ,