کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4286916 | 1612010 | 2012 | 4 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Mortality following Hartmann's procedure – correlation of Dr. Foster's report with CR-POSSUM Mortality following Hartmann's procedure – correlation of Dr. Foster's report with CR-POSSUM](/preview/png/4286916.png)
AimsDr. Foster Intelligence highlighted a higher than expected mortality rate from emergency Hartmann's procedure at a district general hospital from April 2007 to March 2009 (6.5% expected, 30% actual mortality). A retrospective audit of all Hartmann's procedures over 4 years was performed.MethodsNotes were examined for all emergency Hartmann's procedures between April 2006 and March 2010. CR-POSSUM scores were calculated for each patient. Results were analysed in SPSS (IBM Corp.).ResultsThe mean CR-POSSUM score for the entire cohort was 27.78%, which compared to an observed mortality rate of 22.5% (18/80 cases, p = 0.61). There was a significant correlation between mortality and CR-POSSUM score (p = 0.001) and ASA grade (p = 0.001). Those aged 81 and above had a significantly higher mortality (P ≤ 0.05).There was no statistically significant correlation between grade of surgeon and mortality (p = 0.42). Overall consultant presence in theatre was 72.5% (58/79 cases) and in those that died 82.4% (14/17 cases). Those patients who had an admission to diagnosis time of 10 days or more were at significantly greater risk of death (p < 0.05).ConclusionsDr. Foster's data does not sufficiently take into account the pre-operative state of each patient. The CR-POSSUM predicted mortality scores for the studied patient population and the actual mortality were similar. This suggests that the studied patient population were of a higher risk group than presumed by Dr. Foster's data.This study has highlighted that an older population and a delay in diagnosis following admission may have contributed to the increase in mortality in some cases.
Journal: International Journal of Surgery - Volume 10, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 480–483