Have Surgical Outcomes of Pathologic T4 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Really Improved? Analysis of 268 Cases During 45 Years of Experience

BackgroundBecause invasion to an adjacent organ (T4) indicates highly advanced disease, and most surgeons avoid esophagectomy, the prognostic impact of clinicopathologic factors for survival of these patients after esophagectomy has rarely been analyzed.Study DesignFrom 1960 to 2005, a total of 268 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma underwent esophagectomy for pathologic T4 disease (pT4). The impact of clinicopathologic factors on survival was evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis. Changes in surgical outcomes and longterm survival between the earlier period (1960 to 1989) and the later period (1990 to 2005) were analyzed.ResultsOverall survival rates of all patients were 25% at 1 year, 10% at 3 years, and 5% at 5 years. The survival curve of the later group was significantly better than that of the earlier group (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis indicated that venous invasion (hazards ratio, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.33 to 2.33, p < 0.01) and presence of a postoperative complication (hazards ratio, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.96 to 3.51, p < 0.01) were independent risk factors for poor overall survival. Presence of residual cancer was also an independent risk factor for poor cause-specific survival (hazards ratio, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.23 to 4.69, p = 0.01). Venous invasion and intramural metastasis were risk factors for residual cancer. A total of 38 (14%) patients, 15 in the early period and 23 in the later period, underwent complete resection (R0). Although overall survival after R0 resection in the later period improved slightly, cancer-related survival rates were similar in both periods.ConclusionsAlthough overall survival of patients with pT4 improved after 1990, this improvement might be mainly dependent on curability of the resection.