Predictors of surgical non-referral for colorectal liver metastases

BackgroundSurgical resection is the only curative option for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). The objective of our study was to identify factors associated with failure to refer patients with CRLM to a surgeon with oncologic and hepatobiliary expertise.Materials and methodsData were retrospectively reviewed on 75 patients with CRLM treated at our institution. Patients were divided into referred and nonreferred groups for comparison. Quantitative assessment of association was tabulated using the odds ratio (OR). Statistical comparison was performed using the chi-square test and multiple regression models. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Multivariate analysis was done using Cox regression.ResultsFactors independently associated with lower surgical referral rates included age ≥ 65 y (OR 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09-0.89, P = 0.032), bilobar CRLM (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.09-0.97, P = 0.048), and presence of >3 CRLM (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.11-0.94, P = 0.044). The 5-y OS for referred patients was 33% compared with only 8% in patients who were not referred (P < 0.001). Factors independently associated with worse OS included age ≥ 65 y (hazard ratio [HR] 2.01, 95% CI 1.12-3.59, P = 0.019), bilobar hepatic metastases (HR 3.04, 95% CI 1.62-5.70, P < 0.001), and the presence of extrahepatic metastases (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.02-4.16, P = 0.011). Referral to a surgeon was associated with improved OS (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.24-0.74, P = 0.003).ConclusionsFailure to refer CRLM patients for surgical evaluation is associated with aggressive biologic features that do not necessarily preclude resection. Determination of resectability should be made with input from appropriately trained surgical experts.